Glutastic Post

Better? Batter
August 30th, 2010 | caitlin | Categories: Uncategorized
Tagged: , , , ,

Brownies. We like them. We eat them a lot.

And we really like to find new brands. So we were more than happy to do jumpy claps in the isles of Whole Foods when we saw these.

I fell for the Better Batter packaging first. I’m not afraid to admit that I judge a brownie mix by it’s cover. I want companies to care enough to spend the money to catch my eye. AND it makes it much easier to see on a shelf of things filled with Gluten.

We compared it with some other brands and I was happy to see that it was lower in calories and fat than most others. I feel way more justified eating a pan of brownies when I know that I saved some calories.

They baked well and they were easy enough to make. I appreciate things that are easy to prepare. Less work for me the better. Super high points for that.

The brownies were moist and tasty. We liked them, we also liked that they stored well.

The only turn off was the price. They were significantly more expensive than the other popular brands. And enough so that we would think hard about buying them again. There are other brands that are just as good with a better price point. ~cough Bob’s Red Mill cough~

More Glutastic!

« »

2 Comments to “Better? Batter”

  1. kermitology
    September 2nd, 2010 at 8:20 am


    How does the price/taste compare to something like Glutino’s chocolate cake mix?

    I love that cake.

  2. caitlin
    September 2nd, 2010 at 9:07 am


    In my opinion, Glutino’s mix is the best bang for your buck. Better Batter is not any tastier than Glutino so not worth the price jump. BUT if you decide to watch you’re weight, Better Batter is better in terms of calories and fat …. and no I did not just call you fat, don’t be sensitive. :)

Contact Glutastic.com

Category

Glutastic Approved Links

Search Glutastic

Older Glutastic Posts